国产 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕-国产午夜成人精品视频app-国产区精品系列在线观看-在线视+欧美+亚洲日本-丰满熟妇乱又伦在线无码视频

Unitalen Defended Client against “Magnetic levitation” Patent Infringement Suit

December 16, 2016

Posted on December 15, 2016

 

“Maglev (Magnetic levitation)” is a technology that uses magnetic force against gravity to levitate objects. As known, there are 3 kinds of “maglev” technologies: one is the “routine conductive maglev” led by Germany, the second is “superconductive maglev” led by Japan, both of which require electricity power to generate maglev force; and the third is China’s “permanent maglev” which, by using a special permanent magnetic material, doesn’t require any other power support.

 

The plaintiff, Guangdong Zhaoqing HCNT Technology Ltd. is the owner of No. 200610065336.1 invention patent concerning “Magnetic-repellent suspension device”, and had won more than 10 patent infringement suits across the country.

 

On July 27, 2015, the plaintiff filed a suit before Hangzhou Intermediate Court alleging against Shenzhen Hong Xin Tuo Pu Electronic Technology Ltd. (the defendant) for selling in large quantity infringing products on Alibaba and T-Mall online stores, along with the claim for an indemnity of 500,000 yuan and other reasonable legal fees.

 

Entrusted by the defendant, Unitalen attended court hearing with four defenses: 1) prior art defense; 2) doctrine of estoppels, as the plaintiff had voluntarily narrowed down the protection scope of its patent, namely “the levitation object is permanent magnetic levitation object instead of electric magnetic levitation object”; 3) the protection scope of the claims shall be interpreted as being limited to “one ring-shaped permanent magnet” rather than “one and more ring-shaped permanent magnet(s)” despite the open-ended claim with the word “including”; and 4) the technical feature described in claim 1 is a “functional limitation”, under which circumstances the Court shall determine the content of the technical feature by making reference to the specific implementing methods or equivalent methods described in the specifications and drawings, according to Judicial Interpretations concerning patent disputes. But due to the plaintiff’s failure to take on its own “burden of proof” by resorting to judicial expertise, there is no target comparable to the technical solution of the alleged infringing product.   

 

On August 24, 2016, Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court issued the first instance judgment dismissing all of the plaintiff’s claims. According to the court, the plaintiff shall bear the burden to prove the establishment of infringement, the precondition for which is that the alleged infringing product possesses the technical features identical with or equivalents to all of the technical features under the plaintiff’s claims. As the plaintiff withdrew its applications for judicial expertise and professional assistant due to the concern of the high cost, the technical features under the functional limitation cannot be compared one by one, thus it cannot be determined whether the alleged infringing product falls within the protection scope of the patent at issue. Therefore, the patent infringement claims submitted by the plaintiff shall not be sustained. 

 

 

Keywords

主站蜘蛛池模板: 人妻夜夜添夜夜无码av| 亚洲中文字幕无码av网址| 久久精品女同亚洲女同| 亚洲中文字幕无码av永久| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨| 岛国av动作片在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区| 四虎影库在线永久影院免费观看 | 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 尤物yw午夜国产精品大臿蕉| 国产免费拔擦拔擦8x高清在线人| 国产在线无码精品无码| 美女视频黄频a免费| 在线 | 一区二区三区| 五月综合缴情婷婷六月| 九九九精品成人免费视频小说 | 亚洲欧美综合在线中文| 亚洲色成人影院在线观看| 中国精学生妹品射精久久| 欧美极品少妇无套实战| 国产美女被遭强高潮免费网站| 无码少妇精品一区二区免费| 久久亚洲精品无码gv| 亚洲国产日韩一区三区| 色六月婷婷亚洲婷婷六月| 亚洲欧洲自拍拍偷综合| 国产成人无码一区二区三区在线| 亚洲狠狠色丁香婷婷综合| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区涩爱| 97无码免费人妻超级碰碰夜夜| 精品av天堂毛片久久久| 国产高清在线精品一区免费| 国产精品高清网站| 中文字幕一区二区三区四区五区| 日韩在线 | 中文| 国产av亚洲aⅴ一区二区| 久久久久久av无码免费看大片| 永久免费无码日韩视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜无码一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久日本| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品 |